Legal Opinion

Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 13, 1909No. 49PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. The general object of this suit — which was brought by the United States in one of the courts of New Mexico on the twenty-fourth day of May, 1897 — was to obtain an injunction to prevent the Rio Grande Dam and Irrigation Company from .constructing and maintaining a dam across, and a reservoir over and near, the Rio Grande River at a certain point in that Territory.

Read the full summary

APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. The general object of this suit — which was brought by the United States in one of the courts of New Mexico on the twenty-fourth day of May, 1897 — was to obtain an injunction to prevent the Rio Grande Dam and Irrigation Company from .constructing and maintaining a dam across, and a reservoir over and near, the Rio Grande River at a certain point in that Territory. In the court of original jurisdiction the suit was dismissed and the dismissal was affirmed by the- Supreme Court of the Territory; but that judgment was reversed by…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

We perceive no error in the judgment now under review. The main contention of the defendants is that it was error to permit the United States to file its supplemental bill. We do not accept this view of the trial court’s duty. When the cause was last here the court expressed the conviction that if the case was finally disposed of on the record as it then was great wrong might be done to the United States and to all interested in preserving the navigability of the-Rio Grande. Hence, the cause was sent back that' each side might adduce further evidence, if they had any to adduce. When the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. Jenkins v. International Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Finefrock v. Kenova Mine Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. Drake Ex Rel. Imes v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Shepherd v. WardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. United States v. WhitneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API