Chlystek v. Kane
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
This is the third time that the petitioner’s request for the convening of a three-judge court has been before us. Previously, this Court decided that the cause of action involved a “substantial federal question.”1 Now we must determine whether the complaint alleges a basis for granting equitable relief.
A
The petition for summary reversal relates, and the respondents do not deny, the following statement of the case: Adam Chlystek was divorced from his wife on the ground of his adultery. For the last thirty-five years he has lived with Helen Chlystek, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Mitchell v. Commission On Adult Entertainment Establishments Of The State Of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Mitchell v. Commission on Adult Entertainment Establishments of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Pine Township Citizens' Ass'n v. ArnoldDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Chlystek v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976