Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfred Robert Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1994No. 94-30113Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

39 F.3d 1190

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Alfred Robert SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-30113.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 1994.*

Decided Oct. 27, 1994.

Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Alfred Robert Smith appeals his sentence under the Sentencing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Barbara Gail Harrison-PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Loren Adrian SealeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Victor NotrangeloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Swann (James)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API