Legal Opinion
United States v. Victor Notrangelo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 25, 1990No. 89-10221PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Notrangelo appeals a Guidelines sentence on his plea of guilty to being an accessory after the fact to theft. He contends: 1) that he was denied due process when the district court found that upward adjustments for obstruction of justice and more than minimal planning were warranted based on information the presentence report derived from testimony of an eyewitness and an informant in the trial of a co-defendant, and 2) that the court erroneously departed upward on the ground that Notrangelo’s criminal history category did not adequately reflect the seriousness of his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Robin F. WillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Irma Nuno-Para, United States of America v. Jesus Garcia-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Ricardo RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. David Michael MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Jose Becerra Salvatore Larizza Gabriel BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Rafael Pimentel, Amabledeyes Dejesus, Julio Dejesus, Juan Dejesus, Amabledeyes Dejesus, Julio Dejesus, Juan DejesusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. PettyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. LorenzoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Allen L. StreitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.