Legal Opinion
Hickey v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 22, 2000No. 1D99-1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
763 So.2d 1213 (2000)
Howard C. HICKEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D99-1975.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 22, 2000.
Appellant, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
We reverse the order on appeal, which dismissed with prejudice appellant's pro se motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
The Florida Supreme Court has held that failure to meet the oath requirement of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 warrants dismissal without prejudice. See Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993).…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Barfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Morais v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Melton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Rivet v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Mann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Pridgeon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004