State v. Webb
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BARHAM, Judge.
Plaintiff filed this expropriation proceeding under LSA-R.S. 48:441-460, which articles are commonly termed the “quick taking statute”. The petition is accompanied by the certificate of necessity and it is alleged “ * * * it is necessary for petitioner to acquire * * * the above described property, in full ownership, subject to the mineral reservation * * * ” A deposit of what is represented to be full compensation in the amount of $19,490.00 accompanied the petition. All other necessary certificates and attachments and affidavits from the appropriate personnel are a part of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Sears v. City of AkronSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Barnidge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State, Dept. of Highways v. Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- ANR Pipeline Company v. 170.7942 Acres More or Less in Richland and West Carroll Parishes, et al.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026