Legal Opinion
Crandal v. Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1996No. 94-16829PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether a subcontractor has a private cause of action for money due from a contractor under the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 637(d).
FACTS
The United States Bureau of Reclamation hired the lead defendant to repair an aqueduct. Much of the work was application of a sealant to cracks, so that the water would not leak out. The contractor subcontracted this part of the job to KGE, a woman-owned business. KGE formed a joint venture with Mr. Crandal and Mr. Hitchcock to perform the work. Except for work performed by Mr. Greg Crandal and Mr. Kevin…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Longview Fibre Co. v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Milton UTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VARIAN ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gc Micro Corporation v. Defense Logistics AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Gregory C. Mallett v. Wisconsin Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and Judy R. Norman-NunneryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- 41 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 77,009, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7964, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,213 Gregory Lee Crandal Dba Engineered Coatings, Inc. Lyle John Hitchcock v. Ball, Ball and Brosamer, Inc. Don Meek Milton Greenstein Hal StolberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Adams v. Kake Tribal CorporationDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.