Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Capitol Committee v. Clausen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1925No. 19205. Department TwoPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

As everybody ¡mows, tbe United States government, by § 12 of tbe Enabling Act, gave to tbe state fifty sections of land “for the purpose of erecting public buildings at tbe capital of said state for legislative, executive and judicial purposes,” and that by § 17 of tbe same act it gave to tbe state “for public buildings at the state capital, in addition to tbe grant hereinbefore made for that purpose, one hundred thousand acres. . . . ” By appropriate legislative action, the state accepted tbe gift and bound itself to carry into effect its purposes. Section 1, art. 16, of tbe state…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Alabama v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Faulkner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State ex rel. State Capitol Commission v. ListerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Bickford v. CookMontana Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API