Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Cohen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 17, 1944No. 3588PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendants to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction as well as a motion for a more definite statement.
The plaintiff as Administrator of the Office of Price Administration filed a bill of complaint against the defendants alleging a violation of Maximum Price Regulation No. 215, as amended, praying for injunctive relief and. asking treble damages for certain violations. The complaint enumerates specific sales of softwood to the Barclay White Company at prices over and above those fixed as the maximum prices for such softwood. It further avers that all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bowles v. LeitholdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Burns v. DonohueDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1948