Legal Opinion

Hark'n Technologies v. Orange Whip Fitness X

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 14, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00054Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION HARK’N TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Utah MEMORANDUM DECISION AND corporation, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART [118] Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Case No. 1:21-cv-00054-CMR ORANGE WHIP FITNESS X, LLC, et al., Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero Defendants. Before the court is Defendants Orange Whip Fitness X, LLC (Orange Whip), Douglas J. Wald (Wald), and Brian J. Newman’s (Newman) (collectively, Defendants) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Motion) (ECF 118) regarding…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Argo v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Barber Ex Rel. Barber v. Colorado Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Bancoklahoma Mortgage Corp. v. Capital Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API