Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Z.A.T.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 2006No. 10-04-00347-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAD OPINION

FELIPE REYNA, Justice.

Appellant Richard Owen Taylor complains of the trial court’s order modifying the provisions of a divorce decree regarding Appellee Valerie Annette Taylor’s and his parental rights and duties. Richard presents twenty-four issues in which he generally contends: (1) the court abused its discretion by denying his request for a jury trial; (2) the court abused its discretion by denying his motion to order Valerie to bring the children to the trial and by denying him a continuance due to the absence of a witness; (3) the court abused its discretion by limiting his…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Villegas v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Exxon Pipeline Co. v. ZwahrTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. v. RhyneTexas Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Willet v. Cole, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  2. Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  3. In Re Trb, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  4. in Re: The State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
  5. in the Interest of H.S., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API