Legal Opinion
State v. Oliver
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2009No. 03-KA-416, 09-KH-710, 09-KH-711PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARENCE E. McMANUS, Judge.
|2In this appeal, we consider defendant’s allegations of error raised in her pro se brief, which were not considered in defendant’s original appeal. In addition we consider the issues raised in defendant’s two writ applications, no. 09-KH-710 and no. 09-KH-711. For the reasons that follow, we find no merit to defendant’s allegations of error and re-affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence. We further deny defendant’s applications for writs.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant, Rhonda Oliver, was found guilty by a jury of theft of goods valued at $100.00 or more, but less…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CorderoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- State v. NarcisseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. SugastiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JacobsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. WiseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. SkinnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. ThorntonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.