Legal Opinion

Smith v. Reilly

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2011No. 240 SSM 34PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted and the certified question answered in the negative.

Defendant’s submissions establish that she had no knowledge of her dog’s alleged propensity to interfere with traffic. Defendant testified that the dog had never before chased cars, bicycles or pedestrians or otherwise interfered with traffic. Testimony that the dog, on three to five occasions, escaped defendant’s control, barked, and ran towards the road is insufficient…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Collier v. ZambitoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wolfgang Doerr v. Daniel Goldsmith / Cheryl Dobinski v. George O. LockhartNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Bloomer v. ShaugerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Hamlin v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Buicko v. NetoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Flanders v. GoodfellowNew York Court of Appeals · 2025

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API