Legal Opinion

King v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 17, 1984No. 0233PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Justice:

This action involves title to a lot of approximately one-half acre situate on the south side of U. S. 17 in or near Murrells Inlet, South Carolina. Directly to the rear of the subject land is a tract on which Oliver’s Lodge, a well-known restaurant, is operated. Respondent King’s complaint sought to have certain encroachments by appellant Maxine Oliver Hawkins enjoined and removed. Hawkins’ answer and counterclaim set up adverse possession under the 20 and 40 year statutes. The case by consent was tried before the trial judge without a jury; he found that King was the fee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mullis v. WinchesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. MacCaro v. Andrick Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Bailey v. Lyman Printing and Finishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Walker v. OswaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Kirkland v. GrossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Croft v. SandersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Frazier v. SmallseedCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Major v. PENN COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API