Lansing v. Coats
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the DeKalb Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This was an action by Coats, the assignee of a promissory note against Lansing, the assignor. The note bears date August the 10th, 1859; is for the payment of 90 dollars; was executed by Smith § Seely, payable to Lansing, and was by him assigned to Coats. Upon the issues there was a verdict for the plaintiff. Motion for a new trial denied; and judgment, &c.
The only point made in the appellant’s brief relates to the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. In the *167transcript before us there is a copy of what purports to be a bill^of exceptions, which professes to contain all the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. LevistonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Belaval v. CórdovaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
- Logansport Gas-Light & Coke Co. v. DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Belaval v. Córdova DávilaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914