Legal Opinion

Lansing v. Coats

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the DeKalb Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This was an action by Coats, the assignee of a promissory note against Lansing, the assignor. The note bears date August the 10th, 1859; is for the payment of 90 dollars; was executed by Smith § Seely, payable to Lansing, and was by him assigned to Coats. Upon the issues there was a verdict for the plaintiff. Motion for a new trial denied; and judgment, &c.

The only point made in the appellant’s brief relates to the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. In the *167transcript before us there is a copy of what purports to be a bill^of exceptions, which professes to contain all the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. LevistonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Belaval v. CórdovaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
  3. Logansport Gas-Light & Coke Co. v. DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Belaval v. Córdova DávilaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API