Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 20, 1993No. 07-92-0352-CRPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Finding appellant guilty of aggravated robbery, the jury assessed his punishment at confinement for 50 years, and a fine of $2,500. Appellant has presented three points of error, but we are unable to pass on their merits because he waived his right to appeal and, thus, the points are not properly before us. Consequently, we will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

After pronouncing sentence in accordance with the jury’s verdicts on appellant’s guilt and punishment, the trial court outlined for appellant his basic right to appeal his conviction, and appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DickeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Ex Parte TaborCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Ex Parte ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Buck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  2. Delatorre v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  3. Littleton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  4. Freeman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  5. Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API