Legal Opinion

Bartlett & Stancliff v. Boyles

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pleasants County. Bill by Bartlett & Stancliíf, a partnership, against" Samuel Boyles. Decree for complainants, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, President:

This is a suit by Bartlett and Stancliíf, a co-partnership, and Bartlett individually, against Boyles, for a dissolution, accounting and winding up of a mining partnership. Upon bill, answer and report of the commissioner, to whom the cause was referred to take and state an account between the partners, and numerous exceptions thereto by Boyles, overruled, except the sixth, sustained, and in accordance with said report, it was adjudged that Boyles should pay Bartlett, assignee of Bartlett and Stancliíf, $502.32, with interest from July 15, 1902, until paid, being Boyles’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Childers v. NeelyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Robrecht v. RobrechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Moore v. WheelerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Poling v. HuffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Blackmarr v. WilliamsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Darnell v. FlynnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Michigan Minerals, Inc. v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lantz v. TumlinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Jones v. RoseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API