Sipe v. Herman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Adams, J., at May Term, 1912, of Catawba. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice Walker.
1Opinion of the CourtWaleieR, J.
Tbis is a proceeding for the partition of the tract of land described in the petition, especially a tract of 10% acres, among the owners, as tenants in common thereof, they having inherited the land from their ancestor, Mahala Herman, who originally was the owner thereof. Defendants Thomas and Elizabeth Herman deny the tenancy in common of plaintiffs with them and their right to partition, plead sole seizin, and specially aver that the plaintiffs, who are Cain F. Sipe and Fannie 0. Sipe, conveyed their interest, or such as they once had, to Elkanah L. Herman, who devised it by his will to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Manning v. . ManningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Alexander v. . GibbonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Walker v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Huneycutt v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Cox v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stubbs v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1938
- Bailey v. . HaymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942