State v. Beaver
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Judge.
We must initially consider whether the seizure of the shot glass by Officer Poovey was lawful. If it was not, the subsequent arrests of the defendants and searches of their persons and of the vehicle, based upon the fruits of the unlawful seizure, were not made lawful by the later determination that the powder contained in the shot glass was a type of amphetamine or by the finding of marijuana on the person of one of the defendants and in the automobile. The fruits of an unlawful search are not made lawful by the resulting discovery of contraband. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 6…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Reeves v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.