Legal Opinion · Dissent

McDowell Welding & Pipefitting, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 2006No. 01-2126; A125459Published

1DissentArmstrong, J.

The majority concludes that the trial court did not err in denying plaintiff a jury trial on defendants’ counterclaim for specific performance of the parties’ purported settlement agreement. It reasons that plaintiff had to assign error to a ruling other than the trial court’s ruling that denied plaintiff a jury trial on defendants’ counterclaim. The majority is wrong. As I will explain, plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial on the factual issue that was common to plaintiffs claim and defendants’ counterclaim, which is whether the parties had entered into a settlement agreement.

Article I,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API