Legal Opinion

American Milling Co v. Industrial Board

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1917No. 11348PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. John M. Niehaus, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Carter

This case arises under the Worlcmen’s Compensation act now in force, coming here upon writ of error to review the decision of the circuit court of Peoria county quashing the writ of certiorari, the trial judge having certified that in his opinion this was a cause proper to be reviewed by this court.

In August, 1915, plaintiff in error company was engaged in business in South Bartonville, Illinois, and employed Nick Evenoff in its business at that place. On August 3, 1915, an accident occurred which resulted in Evenoff’s death. An application for adjustment of claim was filed with the State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northwestern Iron Co. v. Indusrrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Victor Chemical Works v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Aurora Brewing Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Perin v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pocahontas Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Plano Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Newman v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Storrs v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Wells Bros. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API