Legal Opinion

In Re Exide Technologies

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 30, 2003No. 02-11125 (KJC)PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON CONFIRMATION 2

KEVIN J. CAREY, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Debtor asks that this Court confirm its Fourth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Plan”). 3 Objections to the Plan have been filed by various parties, including, th'e Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Smith Management, LLC, HSBC Bank USA as Indenture Trustee, Enersys, Inc., and others. The hearing to consider confirmation of the Debtor’s Plan was held on October 21, 22, 25, 27, and November 1, 6, and 12, 2003. For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the Debtor’s Plan…

2Cases cited30 opinions

National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
In Re Grant CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
In Re Chemtura Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
In Re Washington Mutual, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2011
In Re Tribune Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2011
In Re Coram Healthcare Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.