Legal Opinion

United States v. Lehman Howard, Also Known as Slim, Joseph Koontz, United States of America v. Rafael Santana

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 31, 1993No. 8, 9 and 45, Dockets 91-1534, 91-1630CON and 91-1631PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-appellants Lehman Howard, Joseph Koontz and Rafael Santana were charged under a single indictment arising from their joint conspiracy to steal and later distribute a quantity of cocaine. Count one charged the three defendants with conspiring to violate 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B)(ii)(II) by possessing with intent to distribute five hundred grams or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Count two charged the three defendants with attempting to violate 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B)(ii)(II) by possessing with intent to distribute…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Derrick ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Manuel Hurtado, Also Known as Jorge Vega, Also Known as ManoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Dale M. HendricksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API