Legal Opinion · Dissent

DAWLEY, DESIREE v. WHITETAIL 414, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 2015No. CA 15-00089Published

1DissentValentino, J.

I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that respondent Town of Tyre Town Board (Town Board) failed to comply strictly with SEQRA’s procedural mandates. To the contrary, I conclude that the Town Board’s determination was made in accordance with lawful procedure (see Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 570 [1990]; Matter of Forman v Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y., 303 AD2d 1019, 1020 [2003]) and, thus, that Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. I would therefore affirm the judgment.

The transcript from the June 12, 2014 meeting satisfied the requirement for “a written…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Akpan v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning, Inc. v. ValloneNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Forman v. Trustees of State UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Residents Against Wal-Mart v. Planning Board of TownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Coursen v. Planning Board of the Town of PompeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API