Legal Opinion
Florida Bar
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 29, 1988No. 72321PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED OPINION
2Per curiam
The Probate and Guardianship Rules Committee of The Florida Bar and the Probate and Guardianship Rules Committee of the Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section, acting as a joint committee, have submitted their quadrennial petition for amendments to the Rules of Probate and Guardianship Procedure. According to the petition, amendments were deemed necessary because of changes in statutory procedures and causes of action, changes brought about by court decisions, and suggestions which were submitted by interested members of the Bar and members of the judiciary.
The committee…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Casto v. CastoSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- In Re Noble's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Falkner v. BlantonSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- CLARA P. DIAMOND v. Tam-Bay RealtyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- American & Foreign Ins. Co. v. DimsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Thames v. JacksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- U.S. Trust Co. of Florida Savings Bank v. HaigDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Hill v. HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- In Re Estate of GleasonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.