Legal Opinion

1704 FARMINGTON, LLC v. City of Memphis

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided October 26, 2009No. 08-cv-2171-STA-cgcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF MEMPHIS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant City of Memphis’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. # 30) filed on June 15, 2009. Plaintiffs have filed a response in opposition, and Defendant has filed a reply brief. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter by virtue of the diversity of citizenship of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The following facts are not in dispute unless otherwise noted. 1 This lawsuit focuses on a concrete…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API