Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Turik v. Town of Surf City

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 2007No. COA06-141Published

1ConcurrenceJackson, Judge

I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the instant case. However, with respect to issue I, I believe that we must reiterate to the court below that when a trial court reviews a decision of a municipal board, it does so in the role of an appellate court and may not make additional findings of fact. See 321 News & Video, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust. of Gastonia, 174 N.C. App. 186, 188, 619 S.E.2d 885, 886 (2005). In the instant case, the trial court made several additional findings of fact which were not contained in the Board’s decision, including:'

4. That Charles F. Riggs &…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batch v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Piney Mountain Neighborhood Ass'n v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. 321 News & Video, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API