Legal Opinion
Anthony Perri (Also Known as Anthony Marino) v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 18, 2003No. 03-5012PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
The appellant seeks to recover twenty-five percent of the amount the government received upon the forfeiture of property owned by a defendant in a criminal case, based upon the information and assistance he provided to the government in developing the ease. He contends that 28 U.S.C. § 524(c)(1)(B), which created the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund and authorized the Attorney General to make specified payments from the Fund, entitled him to the amount he seeks, and that in any event he was entitled to recover that amount on the basis of quantum…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Samish Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Ontario Power Generation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- John Doe, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Aboo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.