Legal Opinion
People v. Pock
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1993No. B069312PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAHN, J. *
Procedural History
By an information filed September 7, 1990, appellant and codefendants Phy Chhem, Cheng James Chhem, and David Tam Oum were charged in 12 counts involving murder, robbery, burglary, and forcible rape. After arraignment and entry of plea, appellant’s trial was severed from that of his three codefendants. Appellant’s motion for appointment of cocounsel pursuant to Penal Code section 987.2 was granted.
On March 4, 1992, a second amended information was filed naming only appellant. Appellant was charged with one count of murder (count 1) in violation of section…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.