Legal Opinion
Tsipouras v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 29, 1997No. C2-96-2606PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
By postconviction petition, appellant sought reversal of his conviction for criminal sexual conduct, alleging that he was denied his constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. We affirm the district court’s summary denial of appellant’s petition.
FACTS
A jury convicted appellant Christopher Tsipouras of first-degree criminal sexual conduct under Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. l(e)(i) (1988), and of third-degree criminal sexual conduct under Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(c) (1988). In 1990, Tsipouras appealed his conviction,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Calvin JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.A. GOMEZ, Warden, and John K. Van De Kamp, Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rodriguez v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Meemken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Jama v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Rodriquez v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Rodriguez v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000