Legal Opinion
Ehrlich v. Barbatsis Holding Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 24, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
63 So.2d 911 (1953)
EHRLICH
v.
BARBATSIS HOLDING CO.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.
March 24, 1953.
Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, for appellant.
E.F.P. Brigham and Phillip Goldman, Miami, for appellee.
BARNS, Justice.
The appellee-plaintiff-lessor brought a suit for a declaratory decree against the appellant-defendant-lessee to have determined whether or not the term of said lease had expired and, if not, when it would expire. Its claim was that the term had expired while the defendant-appellant claimed it had not.
Upon the filing of the answer the plaintiff served a motion for a summary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rupp Hotel Operating Co. v. DonnSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Michael Tuck Foundation, Inc. v. HazelcornCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
- Colonial Hotels, Inc. v. MaynardSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Nelson v. ManningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
3Cited by8 opinions
- Indus. MacHinery, Inc. v. Creative DisplaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Breese Burners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Florida Sportservice, Inc. v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Barnes v. Burger King Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Murray v. Hidden Lake Development Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.