Legal Opinion

Murray v. Hidden Lake Development Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 31, 1973No. 72-1378PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

Frank Murray and Esther Murray were the defendants in an action brought by Hidden Lake Development Corporation wherein Hidden Lake sought recovery under a liquidated damages provision of a contract of sale. An order was entered granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and after a subsequent hearing at which evidence was submitted as to the amount of a reasonable attorney’s fee, the trial court entered its final judgment. The final judgment provided for recovery *538by the plaintiff of $3,000.00 in damages, but denied recovery under the reasonable attorney’s fee…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. Ehrlich v. Barbatsis Holding Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dairy Farm Leasing Co., Inc. v. HartleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Leach v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API