Harris v. Rose
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice RICHTER.
This is a vexatious litigant case. Harris, appearing pro se, asserts that the trial court erred when it dismissed his claims with prejudice after he failed to comply with the court’s order declaring him a vexatious litigant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Background.
Harris is no stranger to litigation. In the past fifteen years, he has filed thirty pro se lawsuits in Dallas county, and has been held in contempt of court twelve times. Neither court orders nor injunctions seem to dissuade Harris from filing lawsuits. When the Unauthorized Practice of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Bowie Memorial Hospital v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Leonard v. Abbott, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- G.R.A.V.I.T.Y. Enterprises, Inc. v. Reece Supply Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
3Cited by31 opinions
- Drum v. Calhoun, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Restrepo v. Alliance Riggers & Constructors, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Drake v. Andrews, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Aubrey v. AubreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Amir-Sharif, Lakeith v. Quick Trip Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.