Legal Opinion

Dickey v. Maysville, Washington, Paris & Lexington Turnpike Road Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 22, 1838PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Assumpsit. From the Circuit Court eor Mason Countt.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

The only question presented for consideration in this case, is whether Milus W. Dickey, as the contractor for carrying the United States’ Mail from Maysville to Lexington, in this State, has the right, in execution of his engagement, to transport the mail in stage coaches on the turnpike road between those termini, without paying, to the use of the Turnpike Company, the rate of tollage exacted by it, under the authority of its charter, from other persons for the transit of their horses and carriages.

All national power should belong exclusively to the general or national government. And, as…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Bost v. Cabarrus CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Burton v. Monticello & Burnside Turnpike Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. In Re SchmolkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Trustees for the Support of Public Schools v. Inhabitants of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API