Legal Opinion

Hackford v. United States

District Court, D. Utah

Decided June 28, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00618Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH RICHITA MARIE HACKFORD, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:23-cv-00618-JCB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, pro se Plaintiff Richita Marie Hackford (“Ms. Hackford”) has consented to Judge Jared C. Bennett conducting all proceedings in this case, including entry of final judgment.1 Before the court is Ms. Hackford’s complaint.2 Ms. Hackford has been permitted to proceed in forma pauperis under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(“IFP Statute”).3 Accordingly,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API