Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Tibbals

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1892No. 532PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Jefferson County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J.

The respondent moves the court to strike this cause from the calendar for the reasons: (1) That the notice of appeal was not recorded in the journal of court below as required by law. (2) The bond filed in this cause is not executed by the guardian ad litem as one of the principals, and refers to an appeal taken prior to or on February 20,1892. No notice of appeal was given or filed until February 23, 1892.

The first ground of the motion is evidently based upon the statutory provision that when the notice of appeal is given in writing, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graetz v. McKenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Poppleton v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. EllisonWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Copeland v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Spokane & Idaho Lumber Co. v. LoyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Robinson v. BaltimoreWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Wright v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API