Legal Opinion

Wright v. Brown

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal erom District Court oe Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, J.

This is replevin for a wagon, horse and harness valued at $200. The case comes here on appeal on points of law from the District Court of Honolulu, where judgment was rendered for the plaintiff.

A preliminary question was raised by a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the defendant had not executed the appeal bond. Two other persons had executed it. The statute (Civ. L. Sec. 1430) requires the appellant to “deposit a sufficient bond,” &c. The appellant did deposit a sufficient bond. The statute does not require him to sign it himself. See *402Drouilhat…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Lindsay v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Johnson v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  4. Town of Partridge v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Black v. CastleHawaii Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  2. In re WikoliHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Correa v. Waiakea Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Holmes v. SerraoHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Lalakea v. Hilo Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API