Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Flatt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 25, 1927Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion op

Judge Dietzman.

Believing that the majority opinion is supported, neither 'by the law, nor by a fair interpretation to be put on the facts alleged in the answer, on a demurrer to which this case went off, I am impelled to dissent.

First, with regard to the law. Section 103 of the Constitution provides:

“The judges1 of county courts, clerks, sheriffs,, surveyors, coronerls, jailers, constables, anid such other officers as the general assembly may from time to time require, shall, before they enter upon the duties of their respective offices, and as often thereafter as may be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bates v. City of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Gay v. Jackson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Lowe v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  5. Bankers Surety Co. v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API