Legal Opinion

Heaston v. Colgrove

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Silas Colgrove sued David Heaston in an action of assumpsit. The declaration contained special counts, and a common count. The special counts were upon the following instrument:

“ An article of agreement made and entered into by and between David Heaston of the one part, and Silas Colgrove of the other part, on this 17th day of May, A. D., 1847, witnesseth: that the said party of the first part for themselves, agree to furnish one double cai’ding machine at the steam saw-mill in Winchester, Randolph coun*266ty, Indiana j also, the necessary power to run two carding machines during the present…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wood, Curtis & Co. v. SeurichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. Hickman v. RaylIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Lilley v. RandallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  4. Dougherty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Graham v. KennedyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API