Pillsbury v. Alaska Packers Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Appellee moves to dismiss appeals separately taken by appellants Pillsbury and Weidemann .from a final decree in admiralty. Grounds of the motion are: (1) That there was no petition for or allowance of either appeal; (2) that appellant Weidemann’s assignment of errors was not filed at or prior to the time of taking his appeal; (3) that Weidemann’s appeal was not taken in- time; and (4) that the decree appealed from is joint, not severable or subject to summons and severance, and that, therefore, if Weidemann’s appeal is dismissed, Pillsbury’s must also he dismissed.
Final…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Territory of Hawaii v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Hume v. FrenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Blaske v. DickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.