Legal Opinion

In re Ray

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 6, 1948No. 5381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJaceson, Judge

Appellant has appealed from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 7, 8, 18, 19, 29, and 31 to 33 inclusive of an application for a patent alleging new and useful improvements in a “THERMOCOUPLE OPERATED CONTROL SYSTEM.” Seven claims were allowed.

The examiner rejected all of the involved claims as unpatentable over the prior art which is as follows:

Harrison, 1,863,373, June 14, 1932.

Ray, 2,084,654, June 22, 1937.

Alder, 2,186,948, January 16, 1940.

Alfery, 2,305,585, December 22,1942.

*1089The Board of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In re StattmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. In re CarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  5. In re GriswoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re DulbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. In re GruschwitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API