Legal Opinion

Haverty v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Nueces. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Hurd. This was an appeal by Haverty and his sureties from a final judgment.on a forfeited bail bond. The material facts appear in the opinion of the court, and are discussed with greater detail by counsel for the appellants—wherefore, there is no occasion to repeat them here.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This is a proceeding on a forfeited bail bond, taken by the sheriff of Nueces county during the vacation of the District Court. The bond was not indorsed or filed at the proper time, as it should have been, but remained in the keeping of the sheriff until a judgment nisi had been entered against the principal and his sureties. The bond was afterwards produced by the district attorney pro tern., and evidence offered to identify it. The appellants never denied its execution. At the April term, 1869, the court ordered that it be filed nunc pro tunc, as of the October term, 1868.

Appellants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slocumb v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gerlach Mercantile Co. v. Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Cundiff v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Gerlach Mercantile Co. v. Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API