Clark v. Chrysler Corporation
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The award goes beyond any instance to be found in the books and the reasoning of my Brother does not supply the want.
Industry must take care of its disabled, but optional gymnasium exercises cannot be said to be a part of employment so that a common mishap in indulgement is an injury arising out of and in the course of employment.
The opinion of my Brother would result in ending the trend toward beneficial consideration of employees along like lines by employers. It stretches terms to hold that plaintiff's injury arose out of and in the course of his employment by defendant.
The employer…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Matter of Wilson v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Tom Joyce 7 Up Company v. LaymanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Daniel v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Industrial Commission v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.