Legal Opinion

Clark v. Chrysler Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1936No. Docket No. 100, Calendar No. 38,606PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The award goes beyond any instance to be found in the books and the reasoning of my Brother does not supply the want.

Industry must take care of its disabled, but optional gymnasium exercises cannot be said to be a part of employment so that a common mishap in indulgement is an injury arising out of and in the course of employment.

The opinion of my Brother would result in ending the trend toward beneficial consideration of employees along like lines by employers. It stretches terms to hold that plaintiff's injury arose out of and in the course of his employment by defendant.

The employer…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Matter of Wilson v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Tom Joyce 7 Up Company v. LaymanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Daniel v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Industrial Commission v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API