Legal Opinion

Vollrath v. Wabash R. Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 6, 1946No. 2052PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, servient owners of lowlands, bring this action against defendant railroad company for damages resulting from the cutting by defendant of its railroad embankment located across the bottom along the upper or north boundary of plaintiffs’ farm, thus allowing flood water to pass through that opening in a concentrated stream onto, plaintiffs’ land below. The plats in evidence adequately portray the topographical conditions as they now exist. There is little dispute concerning the facts. Tersely stated, the primary legal question is whether the railroad which…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Hoyt v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Clark's v. HannibalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  4. Abbott v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Benson v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Heller v. Fire Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Hawkins v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. Belveal v. H. B. C. Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Danner v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API