Legal Opinion · Dissent

Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil Maloney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1989No. 87-3924Published

1DissentCarroll, District Judge

I disagree with the amended opinion issued following rehearing. The reasons expressed in my prior dissent remain as stated in Wood v. Ostrander, 851 F.2d 1212, 1220 (9th Cir.1988) and as supplemented by further review of the qualified immunity issue. Additional concerns are prompted by two opinions of the United States Supreme Court issued since this matter was reargued on November 23,1988, DeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. Soc. Servs. Dept., — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 998, 103 L.Ed.2d 249 (1989) and Canton v. Harris, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989).

The basic (initial) issue to be…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API