Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil Maloney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentCarroll, District Judge
I disagree with the amended opinion issued following rehearing. The reasons expressed in my prior dissent remain as stated in Wood v. Ostrander, 851 F.2d 1212, 1220 (9th Cir.1988) and as supplemented by further review of the qualified immunity issue. Additional concerns are prompted by two opinions of the United States Supreme Court issued since this matter was reargued on November 23,1988, DeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. Soc. Servs. Dept., — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 998, 103 L.Ed.2d 249 (1989) and Canton v. Harris, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989).
The basic (initial) issue to be…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.