Legal Opinion
Calkins v. Blum
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided April 15, 1981No. 78-IV-145PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Chief Judge.
The named plaintiffs, plaintiff-intervenors, 1 and absent proposed class members are aged, blind, or disabled adults, their spouses, and any dependent children. All named plaintiffs have sought medical assistance [medicaid] as medically needy persons. In this action for declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief, the plaintiffs 2 aver, inter alia, that the defendants, administrators of the medicaid program for the State of New York, have determined the medicaid eligibility of medically needy persons in a manner different from, and less…
2Cases cited138 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Appleyard v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Stephen C. Crane, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. State of Texas v. County of Dallas, Ben Ellis, John Orvis, Mike Schwille, Berlaind Brashear and Chuck Miller, Defendants-Appellants-Cross v. Henry Wade and L. E. MurdochCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Crane v. TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Ram v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Lewis v. GrossDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.