Legal Opinion

United States v. Labine

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 25, 1999No. 3:98 CV 7102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the United States’ motion for summary judgment is granted. Accordingly, the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied. Also before the Court is a motion by the Government to strike the affidavit of Robert LaBine, or in the alternative, to reopen discovery as to the issue of the alleged bank account seizure. The United States’ motion to strike the affidavit of Robert LaBine is denied, but the Government’s motion to reopen discovery solely on the bank…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. TolerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. United States v. DoyleDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. United States v. NemecekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  4. Spero v. Community Chevrolet, Inc. (In re Grooms)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API