Legal Opinion
Montez v. McKinna
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 3, 2000No. 99-1347Published
1Opinion of the Court
208 F.3d 862 (10th Cir. 2000)
LORENZO MONTEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
MARK MCKINNA, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 99-1347
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
April 3, 2000
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO (D.C. No. 99-Z-923) [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Submitted on the briefs:
Lorenzo Montez, pro se.
Before TACHA, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
1
After examining petitioner Lorenzo Montez's brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.