Roncker v. Walter
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
700 F.2d 1058
9 Ed. Law Rep. 827
Mary Ann RONCKER On Behalf of Neill RONCKER, Individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Franklin B. WALTER, et al., Defendants,
James N. Jacobs, in his official capacity as Superintendent
of the Cincinnati City School District and Cincinnati City
School District Board of Education; Robert Braddock,
Herbert Brown, Virginia Griffin, Ann Patty, John Rue, David
Schiering and Mary Schloss, in their official capacities as
the members of the Cincinnati City School District Board of
Education, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 81-3494.
United States…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scanlon v. BattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- L.B. Ex Rel. K.B. v. Nebo School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Doe v. Board Education Tullahoma City SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- L. H. v. Hamilton Cty. Dep't of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Straube v. Florida Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- J.A. v. Smith Cnty. Sch. Dist.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.