Stewart v. Gargac (In Re Gargac)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPERION AND ORDER
RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. The Court has reviewed the Memoranda and affidavits, as well as the entire record in this case. Based on that review, and for the following reasons, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment should be Denied, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment should be Denied.
FACTS
The parties appear to agree to the following facts for the purpose of the Motions filed. The Defendants, Maria Gargac and William Gargac, were the owners of a large white…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Betty L. Perkins and Harry A. Perkins v. Thomas L. ScharffeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Crebithrift of America v. Auvenshine (In Re Auvenshine)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Simmons (In Re Simmons)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1981
- Rines v. Harris (In Re Rines)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norm Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc. v. Peterson (In Re Peterson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Stewart v. Gargac (In re Gargac)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988